How many lives does a ton of carbon cost?
R. Daniel Bressler studies consequences of carbon emissions through the additional mortality they bring about in his paper "The mortality cost of carbon".
He extends the DICE-2016 climate economy model with an endogenous mortality response, calibrated to a systematic synthesis of 100 studies on temperature related deaths.
Their main conclusions include:
The mortality framing converts the SCC into a tangible health metric, which strengthens the case for internal carbon prices, and sharpens the debate around its use in cost-benefit analyses.
This paper's $258 SCC estimate sits well above the figures historically used in impact assessments, and aligns with the recent upward revision of internal carbon prices from central banks.
The methodology however only captures temperature-related deaths, leaving out flooding, infectious disease, food supply disruptions, or conflict-driven mortality, which the literature considers equally consequential.
The framework also values lives at a single global average, masking large regional heterogeneity and how public policies can best address the predicted consequences of these carbon emissions.