[What sustainable investors actually believe 1/5]
What happens when a pension fund gives its members a real vote?
Rob Bauer, Tobias Ruof, and Paul Smeets ran two field surveys in 2018 with a Dutch pension fund managing €20.8B in "Get Real! Individuals Prefer More Sustainable Investments".
The pension fund's board committed in advance to implement the outcome of a binding member vote on expanding SDG-based engagement, so the choice was consequential and the stated preferences credible.
Their main conclusions include:
This article presents a specific example where a consequential binary vote elicits truthful beneficiary preferences and hands the board a mandate to double down on ESG.
If two thirds of beneficiaries knowingly accept a possible return sacrifice, acting on sustainability preferences is not a deviation from fiduciary duty or loyalty to clients but an expression of it.
As limitations, members voted on expanding an existing sustainable policy, not on introducing one, and response rates were 6.7% and 6.3% in a single Dutch pension fund.