As the energy transition accelerates worldwide, onshore wind power has become a key lever for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and achieving climate objectives. At the same time, the rapid deployment of renewable energy infrastructure raises important questions about its interactions with biodiversity and ecosystems.
To help address these questions, Mirova Research Center (MRC) and the Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité (FRB) launched a three-year research partnership dedicated to improving scientific understanding of the biodiversity impacts of renewable energy infrastructure and the effectiveness of mitigation measures.
This programme combines systematic reviews of the scientific literature, targeted research funding, and dialogue with scientists, policymakers, and industry stakeholders. It covers three major renewable energy technologies: onshore wind, offshore wind, and ground-mounted solar energy.
The first publication series focuses on onshore wind energy and its impacts on flying biodiversity, including birds and bats. Drawing on an extensive review of the international scientific literature, the research examines the effects of wind energy infrastructure across its lifecycle—from construction to operation—and evaluates available solutions to avoid, reduce, or mitigate negative impacts.
For each renewable energy technology studied, the programme delivers four complementary publications designed for both scientific and non-scientific audiences:
Together, these publications provide a robust evidence base to support decision-making and contribute to a more biodiversity-compatible energy transition.
The research highlights that the main biodiversity impacts of onshore wind installations occur during the construction and operational phases.
Among the impacts identified are:
The publications also present recommendations for researchers, policymakers, developers, and operators, with the objective of improving impact assessment, strengthening mitigation measures, and promoting more sustainable development practices.
By bringing together the latest scientific knowledge and translating it into actionable recommendations, this work contributes to a better understanding of how climate and biodiversity objectives can be pursued together.
Beyond assessing impacts, the programme also examined the effectiveness of existing mitigation measures and identified practices that can help reduce risks for biodiversity.
The review highlights several promising approaches, including:
The research also stresses that mitigation effectiveness is often species- and context-specific, highlighting the need for continued monitoring, local adaptation, and further scientific research.
Building on the scientific evidence, the programme formulates recommendations for three key audiences:
For the scientific community, priorities include improving collision-risk modelling, developing and testing new mitigation technologies, strengthening research on under-studied species such as insects, and promoting standardized methodologies and data sharing.
For developers and operators, the report recommends integrating biodiversity considerations from the earliest stages of project design, deploying effective mitigation technologies, implementing robust monitoring programmes, and increasing transparency around biodiversity impacts and performance.
For policymakers and public authorities, the research calls for clearer regulatory frameworks, greater support for biodiversity research, stronger monitoring requirements, and enhanced collaboration between scientists, industry, and local communities.
By bringing together the latest scientific knowledge and translating it into actionable recommendations, this work contributes to a better understanding of how climate and biodiversity objectives can be pursued together.