(When) does it pay to be green?
Andrew King and Michael Lenox found that lower pollution levels were linked with higher market valuations, but only under the right conditions, in « Does It Really Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance ».
This landmark analysis of 652 US manufacturing firms over the 1987-1996 period relies on longitudinal data and regressions to control for time-invariant firm traits and isolate the environment-profit relationship.
Its key takeaways include:
According to this article, it likely paysto be green under specific conditions only for instance in in firms with the right innovative capabilities or in industries where greener practices confer a competitive edge.
It is important to note this study is correlational and could not definitively pin down cause and effect: well-managed firms might simply excel at both profitability and pollution control.
Also, the data is limited to 1987-1996 manufacturers, which is why the authors themselves call for further research into what firm characteristics enable profitable environmental improvement.